01
Speed you can plan around
Platform-grade scope in a fraction of the usual time, with milestones you accept on deliverables.
Our AI-native approach
We don't add AI. We build with it, from day one
This page is the honest version of how that works. No percentages we can't prove. Just the practice.
Docs first, code secondHuman review on everythingMilestones accepted on deliverables, not datesFull ownership. Always.JabFab Experience optimization platform911Switch In an emergency, be seenMeLiSA Medical simulation supportPredictr Skill-based stock prediction
A week of delivery, sketched
The headline fact
No one here writes code by hand anymore
All development at Buzzinga happens through coding agents, mostly Claude Code and Codex. That sentence sounds like hype until you see what it changes in a week of work.
Our engineers spend their day where humans are irreplaceable: understanding the problem, deciding the architecture, reviewing what ships. The mechanical work happens through agents, sometimes running long after the office empties. Verifying quality never moves to the agent. Each engineer stays responsible for what they ship.
Humans own
The problem, the architecture, the review. Responsibility never moves.
Agents carry
The mechanical work, sometimes running long after the office empties.
The practice
How a week of delivery actually looks
Five habits, in the order they happen. None of them are exotic. Together they are why the timelines hold.
01
Understand before building
Discovery produces written scope, assumptions, and risks. We design systems around real operational workflows, not just screens.
02
Docs first, code second
Every repo carries whole-app documentation in markdown: architecture, how-it-works, feature docs, personas. Agents and people both learn the product from these docs before touching the code. Right understanding builds the right thing.
03
Plan by day, build by agent
An engineer spends the day on planning and research: architecture decisions, migrations, tricky flows. Then hands implementation to agents with precise instructions.
04
Review like it's ours
Human review on everything. Design and architecture decisions never leave human hands.
05
Ship in accepted milestones
Fixed price, milestones accepted on deliverables, not dates.
What changed
Roles stopped mapping to job titles
Our designers build frontends; some products have no Figma at all, the UI is built directly with agents against hard design rules in the codebase. Engineers move across the stack. What holds it together isn't titles, it's the documentation, the design rules, and the review discipline.
Consistency was the hardest problem with agent-built UIs. We solved it the boring way: strict rules that live inside each codebase, where agents can't miss them.
What holds it together
Documentation in every repoDesign rules in the codebaseReview discipline
Why it matters to you
What the practice buys you
02
A codebase that explains itself
The docs-in-the-codebase practice means the product isn't trapped in anyone's head. Any engineer, or agent, can pick it up.
03
Systems ready for what's next
A codebase agents can navigate today is a system agents can help operate tomorrow.
Explore our services ->Proof in the wild
A recent example
An embedded software security company needed an internal app. There was no Figma at all. A brainstorming session covering scope and architecture went straight into development, and the demo build reached staging in weeks.
The practice above is why that timeline was normal for us, not heroic.
See more work ->Next step
Want this practice on your product?
Tell us what you're imagining. We'll reply with an honest take on scope, approach, and whether AI belongs in it at all.
Fixed price, milestone-based. Milestones accepted on deliverables, not dates.